BRIDGES, ANALYSIS STRUCTURE AND DESIGN

INTRODUCTION OF BRIDGES, ANALYSIS STRUCTURE AND DESIGN :

The several reasons for a structure being prone to failures include: (a) the strength of the various components of the structure cannot be assessed with full certainty; (b) the loads that a structure will be called upon to sustain also cannot be predicted with certainty; and (c) the condition of a structure may deteriorate with time due to the effects of the environment, causing it to lose strength.

BRIDGES, ANALYSIS STRUCTURE AND DESIGN

Because of these factors, there exists a probability that the strength of a structure will at some time be exceeded by the loads that it has to sustain, resulting in the failure of the structure. As noted in Sect. 1.3.2, the term failure is being used here not only to signify the collapse of the whole structure, but also to include the situation of the structure not being able to fulfil one or more of its intended functions.

The probability of failure of a structure can be reduced by increasing its design strength, which invariably leads to a higher first cost. The role of the structural engineer is to strike a socially acceptable balance between the risk of failure and the cost of the structure. For example, a bridge can indeed be built to have the same probability of failure as the pyramids of Giza,. The cost of such a bridge, however, is likely to be so high that society may not be prepared to pay for it. By contrast, society may not be prepared to accept in a bridge the same high frequency of failure as in an automobile. Bridges

It is sometimes argued that a good engineer can strike a balance intuitively between the cost and safety of a structure, and that design codes tend to restrict the creative ability of the designer. The ideal criteria for structural design, it is argued, are those which merely require that a structure remain safe while fulfilling its intended functions. Examples of the world’s most spectacular bridges, which have very long spans and for which there existed no design codes until recently, are given in defence of the argument for having no design code at all bridges.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *